For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.
Related tables: Means Frequencies

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS  
Your results compared to COHORT
Areas of strength in BLUE
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1) med. (.3) lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2020
Departmental Collegiality
3.73
Hum
 
 
 
VPA
 
 
 
 
other
other
 
 
Colleagues support work/life balance
3.67
 
 
other
other
VPA
 
HHE
 
 
other
 
 
 
Meeting times compatible with personal needs
4.04
other
other
 
 
VPA
 
other
 
 
 
 
Oth
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.57
 
other
 
Bio
 
 
other
 
 
 
other
 
-
How well you fit
3.54
Hum
 
Phy
 
 
other
 
 
 
other
other
 
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured
3.60
Hum
other
 
Bio
 
 
HHE
 
 
other
other
 
 
Colleagues pitch in when needed
3.60
Hum
Soc
other
 
VPA
 
HHE
 
 
 
other
 
-
Department is collegial
3.94
Hum
 
 
Bio
VPA
other
other
 
 
other
 
Oth
 
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion
3.96
 
Soc
Phy
 
VPA
 
other
 
 
other
other
 
 
Departmental Engagement
3.47
Hum
 
 
other
VPA
 
HHE
other
 
 
 
 
 
Discussions of undergrad student learning
3.56
other
Soc
 
other
other
other
 
other
 
Edu
Med
other
 
Discussions of grad student learning
3.47
Hum
other
other
other
VPA
 
HHE
 
 
other
other
Oth
 
Discussions of effective teaching practices
3.46
other
Soc
 
other
VPA
 
HHE
 
 
other
other
other
 
Discussions of effective use of technology
3.29
 
Soc
 
 
 
 
 
 
other
Edu
 
other
 
Discussions of current research methods
3.22
Hum
 
 
 
VPA
other
 
other
 
other
other
Oth
 
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.67
Hum
 
 
 
other
 
 
 
Edu
other
 
-
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured
3.65
Hum
 
 
Bio
other
 
HHE
 
 
 
other
 
 
Departmental Quality
3.66
other
 
 
other
VPA
 
other
other
 
other
Med
Oth
 
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty
3.71
 
 
 
VPA
other
HHE
other
 
other
 
Oth
 
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty
4.09
other
other
 
other
VPA
other
other
other
Bus
other
Med
Oth
-
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty
3.71
 
 
 
 
VPA
 
 
other
 
other
 
Oth
 
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty
4.06
other
other
Phy
other
VPA
 
other
 
Bus
other
Med
Oth
 
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty
3.68
other
 
Phy
other
VPA
ECM
 
other
 
other
 
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty
3.84
other
other
Phy
other
VPA
ECM
other
other
 
other
Med
Oth
 
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment
3.75
 
Soc
other
 
VPA
other
 
other
other
other
Med
Oth
 
Dept. is successful at faculty retention
3.38
Hum
Soc
other
other
VPA
ECM
other
other
other
other
Med
Oth
 
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance
2.58
Hum
Soc
 
 
VPA
other
HHE
other
 
 
Med
 
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty
3.87
 
other
Phy
 
other
 
other
 
other
other
 
Oth
 
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty
3.73
 
other
Phy
 
other
ECM
 
 
 
other
Med
Oth
 
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty
4.05
other
other
Phy
other
 
ECM
other
 
other
other
Med
Oth
 
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT
3.65
Hum
 
Phy
Bio
other
 
HHE
 
 
other
other
 
 
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT
3.58
Hum
other
Phy
Bio
other
 
 
 
other
other
other
 
 
Recruiting part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Managing part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A