For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.
Related tables: Means Frequencies

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◖
Your results compared to COHORT ◗
Areas of strength in BLUE
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1) med. (.3) lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2020
Departmental Collegiality
3.73
pre-ten
 
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Colleagues support work/life balance
3.67
 
 
 
women
 
white
 
 
Meeting times compatible with personal needs
4.04
 
 
 
men
 
 
 
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.57
 
tenured
assoc
 
 
 
 
-
How well you fit
3.54
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured
3.60
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Colleagues pitch in when needed
3.60
 
 
assoc
women
white
white
 
-
Department is collegial
3.94
 
 
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion
3.96
pre-ten
 
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Departmental Engagement
3.47
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Discussions of undergrad student learning
3.56
pre-ten
 
 
women
foc
asian
 
 
Discussions of grad student learning
3.47
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Discussions of effective teaching practices
3.46
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discussions of effective use of technology
3.29
pre-ten
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discussions of current research methods
3.22
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.67
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
 
 
 
-
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured
3.65
pre-ten
 
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
 
Departmental Quality
3.66
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty
3.71
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty
4.09
 
 
assoc
 
 
asian
 
-
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty
3.71
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty
4.06
 
 
 
men
foc
asian
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty
3.68
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty
3.84
 
ntt
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment
3.75
N<5
N<5
 
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Dept. is successful at faculty retention
3.38
N<5
N<5
 
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance
2.58
pre-ten
 
assoc
women
white
 
white
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty
3.87
 
tenured
 
men
foc
asian
 
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty
3.73
 
tenured
 
men
 
asian
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty
4.05
 
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT
3.65
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT
3.58
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
 
asian
 
 
Recruiting part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Managing part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A