For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS  
Your results compared to COHORT
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2017
Appreciation and Recognition
3.23
tenured
 
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Recognition: For teaching
3.30
 
 
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Recognition: For advising
3.02
 
ntt
assoc
women
white
white
white
-
Recognition: For scholarship
3.32
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
 
 
Recognition: For service
3.05
tenured
 
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Recognition: For outreach
3.13
 
 
assoc
women
 
white
 
 
Recognition: From colleagues
3.62
 
ntt
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Recognition: From CAO
2.76
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
urm
+
Recognition: From Dean
2.95
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
urm
 
Recognition: From Head/Chair
3.47
 
 
assoc
women
 
 
 
-
School/college is valued by Pres/Provost
3.29
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
urm
+
Dept. is valued by Pres/Provost
3.01
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
urm
+
CAO cares about faculty of my rank
3.18
tenured
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
 
+