For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2017
Departmental Collegiality
3.79
Hum
Soc
 
other
 
 
 
other
other
Edu
other
-
Colleagues support work/life balance
3.70
other
Soc
Phy
other
VPA
 
 
other
other
Edu
 
Oth
 
Meeting times compatible with personal needs
4.10
other
Soc
Phy
other
VPA
 
 
other
 
 
 
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.70
 
 
other
 
other
ECM
 
other
other
Edu
 
 
 
How well you fit
3.55
Hum
Soc
 
 
 
 
other
 
other
 
 
other
-
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured
3.60
 
Soc
other
 
other
 
 
other
other
Edu
other
 
 
Colleagues pitch in when needed
3.74
Hum
Soc
other
Bio
 
other
 
other
 
Edu
other
 
 
Department is collegial
4.04
Hum
Soc
 
 
VPA
other
 
other
other
 
 
Oth
 
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion
3.93
 
Soc
other
other
other
 
HHE
 
other
other
other
 
-
Departmental Engagement
3.48
 
Soc
other
other
other
other
 
 
other
 
Med
other
 
Discussions of undergrad student learning
3.52
other
Soc
other
other
other
other
 
 
Bus
 
Med
other
 
Discussions of grad student learning
3.45
Hum
 
 
other
VPA
other
 
 
other
 
 
 
 
Discussions of effective teaching practices
3.38
other
Soc
other
other
other
 
HHE
 
other
 
Med
other
 
Discussions of effective use of technology
3.25
Hum
Soc
 
 
other
 
 
 
other
 
 
other
 
Discussions of current research methods
3.30
Hum
Soc
 
other
 
other
 
Agr
other
 
 
 
 
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.84
 
Soc
other
other
other
ECM
 
 
Bus
 
 
other
 
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured
3.68
Hum
Soc
other
other
 
 
other
 
Bus
Edu
other
 
-
Departmental Quality
3.68
 
Soc
other
other
 
other
 
 
other
 
Med
Oth
 
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty
3.69
Hum
Soc
other
other
VPA
other
 
 
 
Edu
 
Oth
 
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty
4.22
other
 
other
other
other
 
 
 
other
Edu
Med
 
 
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty
3.61
 
Soc
other
other
VPA
other
 
 
 
 
 
Oth
 
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty
4.08
 
 
other
other
other
 
 
Agr
other
 
Med
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty
3.63
 
Soc
 
other
VPA
 
 
 
other
 
 
other
-
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty
3.91
other
 
 
Bio
other
ECM
 
Agr
other
other
 
Oth
 
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment
3.76
other
Soc
other
Bio
other
 
 
 
other
other
Med
 
 
Dept. is successful at faculty retention
3.30
 
Soc
other
 
other
other
HHE
other
other
other
Med
 
-
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance
2.52
other
Soc
 
other
other
other
HHE
 
Bus
Edu
 
 
-
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty
3.84
Hum
 
 
Bio
other
 
 
 
other
 
 
other
+
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty
3.66
Hum
 
Phy
Bio
other
other
 
 
other
 
 
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty
4.06
 
Soc
 
 
 
 
 
 
other
other
Med
other
 
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT
3.74
Hum
Soc
other
Bio
other
 
other
other
Bus
Edu
 
other
 
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT
3.67
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
other
 
 
other
Bus
Edu
 
other
 
Recruiting part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Managing part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A