COACHE Aware

For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

	Your results compared to PEERS ◀ Your results compared to COHORT ▶							Areas of strength in GREEN Areas of concern in RED							Within campus differences sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
	mean	overall	tenured	pre-ten	ntt	full	assoc	men	women	white	foc	asian	urm	ten vs pre-ten	ten vs ntt	full vs assoc	men vs women	white vs foc	white vs asian	white vs urm	2017
Departmental Collegiality	3.79															assoc	women			urm	-
Colleagues support work/life balance	3.70													tenured	tenured	assoc			white
Meeting times compatible with personal needs	4.10																			urm
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure	3.70													tenured	ntt	assoc	women
How well you fit	3.55														ntt	assoc	women				-
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured	3.60														ntt	assoc	women			urm
Colleagues pitch in when needed	3.74															assoc	women			urm
Department is collegial	4.04															assoc	women
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion	3.93													pre-ten		assoc	women	foc	asian	urm	-
Departmental Engagement	3.48													pre-ten	ntt	assoc	women		asian
Discussions of undergrad student learning	3.52														ntt	assoc	women		asian
Discussions of grad student learning	3.45													pre-ten	ntt	assoc	women			white
Discussions of effective teaching practices	3.38													pre-ten		assoc			asian
Discussions of effective use of technology	3.25													pre-ten	ntt	assoc	women
Discussions of current research methods	3.30														ntt	assoc	women
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure	3.84													tenured	ntt	assoc	women
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured	3.68													pre-ten	ntt	assoc	women	foc		urm	-
Departmental Quality	3.68															assoc	women			urm
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty	3.69													pre-ten		assoc	women	foc		urm
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty	4.22													tenured		assoc		foc	asian	urm
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty	3.61													pre-ten		assoc	women
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty	4.08													tenured	ntt	assoc	women	foc	asian
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty	3.63													pre-ten	ntt	assoc					-
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty	3.91													tenured	ntt	assoc
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment	3.76			N<5										N<5		assoc		foc	asian	urm
Dept. is successful at faculty retention	3.30			N<5										N<5		assoc	women	foc		urm	-
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance	2.52													pre-ten	ntt	assoc	women				-
Related Survey Items	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty	3.84													tenured	tenured	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty	3.66													tenured	tenured	assoc	women	foc	asian	white
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty	4.06													tenured	tenured			foc	asian	urm
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT	3.74															assoc	women	foc	asian	urm
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT	3.67														tenured	assoc	women	foc	asian	urm
Recruiting part-time faculty	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Managing part-time faculty	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A