For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2017
Governance: Trust
2.86
Hum
Soc
other
Bio
VPA
 
other
other
 
other
 
Oth
 
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
2.74
Hum
 
other
Bio
 
 
HHE
other
other
other
 
 
 
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.00
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
 
other
other
other
 
Oth
 
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.03
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
N<5
 
other
other
 
N<5
 
 
Oth
 
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
2.72
N<5
Hum
 
 
Bio
 
other
other
other
N<5
 
 
Oth
 
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.02
N<5
Hum
 
other
Bio
VPA
 
other
 
N<5
 
Med
Oth
 
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.92
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
other
other
N<5
 
other
Oth
+
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.39
N<5
Hum
 
 
Bio
VPA
 
other
 
N<5
 
other
Oth
 
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.77
N<5
Hum
 
other
other
VPA
 
other
other
N<5
other
other
Oth
+
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.01
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
other
other
N<5
 
 
Oth
 
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.33
N<5
 
Soc
other
 
 
 
other
other
N<5
Edu
 
Oth
 
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
2.70
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
other
other
 
other
other
Oth
 
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
2.69
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
 
other
other
Bus
other
other
 
 
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.73
Hum
 
 
Bio
VPA
 
other
other
Bus
 
other
Oth
 
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.39
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
 
other
other
other
other
N<5
 
 
Oth
 
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
2.79
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
Phy
N<5
other
 
other
other
N<5
Edu
other
Oth
 
Governance: Adaptability
2.74
Hum
Soc
 
 
 
other
other
other
Bus
other
other
Oth
 
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.70
Hum
Soc
Phy
 
 
other
 
other
 
other
other
Oth
 
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.59
Hum
 
 
Bio
VPA
other
 
 
 
other
 
 
+
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
2.87
Hum
 
 
other
 
 
other
other
Bus
Edu
 
Oth
 
Governance: Productivity
2.77
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
 
other
Bus
other
other
 
 
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
2.62
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
other
 
Bus
other
other
 
 
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.13
N<5
Hum
 
 
 
other
 
other
other
N<5
 
other
 
 
Public recognition of progress
2.61
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
 
other
 
other
N<5
other
other