For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2017
Leadership: Senior
3.11
tenured
 
assoc
women
white
white
 
+
Pres/Chancellor: Pace of decision making
3.16
tenured
 
assoc
women
white
white
 
-
Pres/Chancellor: Stated priorities
3.11
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
white
white
 
-
Pres/Chancellor: Communication of priorities
2.95
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
 
-
CAO: Pace of decision making
3.24
tenured
 
assoc
women
 
white
urm
+
CAO: Stated priorities
3.17
tenured
 
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
CAO: Communication of priorities
3.04
tenured
 
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
CAO: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Divisional
3.18
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
urm
 
Dean: Pace of decision making
3.24
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
urm
 
Dean: Stated priorities
3.21
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
urm
 
Dean: Communication of priorities
3.17
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
urm
 
Dean: Ensuring faculty input
3.11
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
 
 
Leadership: Departmental
3.56
tenured
tenured
assoc
women
 
 
 
-
Head/Chair: Pace of decision making
3.56
tenured
tenured
assoc
women
 
 
 
-
Head/Chair: Stated priorities
3.52
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
 
 
-
Head/Chair: Communication of priorities
3.47
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
white
 
-
Head/Chair: Ensuring faculty input
3.57
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
 
 
 
-
Head/Chair: Fairness in evaluating work
3.68
tenured
tenured
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
-
Leadership: Faculty
2.98
tenured
 
 
 
 
white
 
 
Faculty leaders: Pace of decision making
2.95
tenured
tenured
 
 
white
white
white
 
Faculty leaders: Stated priorities
3.03
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Faculty leaders: Communication of priorities
2.89
tenured
 
 
 
white
white
white
 
Faculty leaders: Ensuring faculty input
3.07
tenured
 
full
 
 
 
 
+
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Priorities are stated consistently
2.87
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
white
white
 
+
Priorities are acted on consistently
2.74
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
white
white
 
+
Changed priorities negatively affect my work
2.80
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
white
 
white
+
CAO: Support in adapting to change
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Visible leadership for support of diversity
4.07
 
 
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
-