For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2017
Interdisciplinary Work
2.79
Hum
 
 
other
VPA
other
other
Agr
other
 
other
Oth
 
Budgets encourage interdiscip. work
2.79
Hum
 
 
other
VPA
other
 
Agr
other
 
other
Oth
 
Facilities conducive to interdiscip. work
2.84
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
other
other
 
other
other
 
Oth
 
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in merit
2.67
Hum
 
other
other
 
 
other
Agr
other
 
 
Oth
 
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in promotion
2.74
Hum
Soc
other
other
VPA
other
other
Agr
other
Edu
 
Oth
 
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in tenure
2.66
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
Agr
N<5
 
other
Oth
 
Dept. knows how to evaluate interdiscip. work
2.79
Hum
other
 
other
 
other
 
Agr
other
Edu
 
Oth
 
Collaboration
3.75
Hum
Soc
other
other
 
other
other
other
other
Edu
 
 
 
Opportunities for collab. within dept
3.76
Hum
Soc
other
other
other
other
 
other
other
Edu
 
 
 
Opportunities for collab. outside inst
3.82
Hum
Soc
other
other
VPA
 
other
other
other
Edu
 
Oth
 
Opportunities for collab. outside dept
3.66
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
 
other
 
other
Edu
 
 
 
Mentoring
3.12
 
Soc
other
other
VPA
other
other
Agr
other
other
 
Oth
 
Effectiveness of mentoring within dept.
3.75
Hum
Soc
 
 
VPA
other
other
 
other
other
 
 
 
Effectiveness of mentoring outside dept.
3.63
other
Soc
other
other
 
 
 
Agr
other
other
 
Oth
 
Mentoring of pre-tenure faculty in dept
3.24
other
Soc
other
other
VPA
 
other
Agr
other
other
Med
Oth
-
Mentoring of tenured associate profs in dept
2.46
Hum
Soc
 
other
VPA
 
other
other
other
other
Med
Oth
-
Support for faculty to be good mentors
2.31
Hum
Soc
other
 
other
other
other
 
other
 
Med
Oth
-
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in reappointment
2.71
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Soc
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
other
Agr
N<5
N<5
Med
 
 
Being a mentor is fulfilling
4.24
other
Soc
 
Bio
VPA
 
other
other
other
other
other
other
 
Effectiveness of mentoring outside the inst.
4.01
other
 
other
other
 
 
HHE
Agr
other
other
Med
 
 
Mentoring of NTT faculty in dept
2.27
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
 
 
N<5
Edu
Med
 
-
Interest in interdisciplinary work
3.77
Hum
 
 
other
VPA
 
Agr
Bus
 
 
other