For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS  
Your results compared to COHORT
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2017
Nature of Work: Research
3.35
 
 
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Time spent on research
3.56
 
ntt
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Expectations for finding external funding
3.24
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
urm
+
Influence over focus of research
4.27
 
ntt
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Quality of grad students to support research
3.43
 
 
assoc
women
 
asian
 
 
Support for research
3.10
tenured
 
assoc
 
white
 
white
+
Support for engaging undergrads in research
3.16
 
ntt
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Support for obtaining grants (pre-award)
3.35
tenured
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
urm
+
Support for maintaining grants (post-award)
3.14
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
women
white
white
white
-
Support for securing grad student assistance
2.99
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
 
urm
 
Support for travel to present/conduct research
3.45
tenured
tenured
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
Availability of course release for research
2.76
tenured
ntt
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Nature of Work: Service
3.22
tenured
tenured
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Time spent on service
3.36
tenured
tenured
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Support for faculty in leadership roles
2.76
tenured
 
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Number of committees
3.39
tenured
tenured
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Attractiveness of committees
3.36
 
tenured
assoc
women
white
white
 
 
Discretion to choose committees
3.41
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
urm
 
Equitability of committee assignments
2.92
 
tenured
assoc
women
 
white
 
-
Number of student advisees
3.69
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
 
 
Support for being a good advisor
2.92
 
 
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Equity of the distribution of advising responsibilities
2.90
tenured
 
assoc
women
 
 
 
-
Nature of Work: Teaching
3.75
 
 
assoc
women
 
 
 
-
Time spent on teaching
3.82
pre-ten
tenured
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Number of courses taught
3.85
tenured
 
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Level of courses taught
4.05
 
 
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Discretion over course content
4.27
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Number of students in classes taught
3.72
 
ntt
assoc
women
 
white
 
 
Quality of students taught
3.66
 
tenured
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Equitability of distribution of teaching load
3.07
tenured
 
assoc
women
 
 
 
-
Quality of grad students to support teaching
3.52
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Teaching schedule
3.90
tenured
 
assoc
women
 
 
urm
 
Support for teaching diverse learning styles
3.55
 
 
assoc
women
 
asian
white
 
Support for assessing student learning
3.61
 
 
assoc
women
 
 
white
 
Support for developing online/hybrid courses
3.46
 
tenured
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Support for teaching online/hybrid courses
3.45
 
tenured
assoc
women
 
white
 
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Time spent on outreach
3.62
pre-ten
 
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Time spent on administrative tasks
2.80
 
tenured
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Ability to balance teaching/research/service
3.25
 
 
assoc
women
white
white
white