For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.
Related tables: Means Frequencies

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◖
Your results compared to COHORT ◗
Areas of strength in BLUE
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1) med. (.3) lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2020
Tenure Policies
3.60
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Clarity of tenure process
3.78
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Clarity of tenure criteria
3.72
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Clarity of tenure standards
3.37
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Clarity of body of evidence for deciding tenure
3.59
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Clarity of whether I will achieve tenure
3.64
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Clarity of grievance procedures
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Consistency of messages about tenure
3.34
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
 
 
 
+
Tenure decisions are performance-based
3.87
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Tenure Expectations: Clarity
3.34
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
 
 
urm
+
Clarity of expectations: Scholar
4.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
foc
 
urm
+
Clarity of expectations: Teacher
3.81
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
 
 
urm
+
Clarity of expectations: Advisor
3.33
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
 
white
urm
 
Clarity of expectations: Colleague
3.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
asian
 
+
Clarity of expectations: Campus citizen
2.86
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
 
white
 
+
Clarity of expectations: Broader community
2.85
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
white
white
 
 
Promotion to Full
3.71
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
white
 
Dept. culture encourages promotion
3.67
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
 
white
 
Reasonable expectations: Promotion
3.78
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
white
 
Clarity of promotion process
3.89
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
 
 
Clarity of promotion criteria
3.82
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
white
 
Clarity of promotion standards
3.58
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
 
 
Clarity of body of evidence for promotion
3.88
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
 
 
Clarity of time frame for promotion
3.42
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
 
 
Clarity of whether I will be promoted
3.28
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N<5
women
white
white
white
+
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
NTT - Clarity of contract renewal process
2.77
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
full
women
white
white
white
 
NTT - Clarity of contract renewal criteria
2.91
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
full
women
white
white
white
 
NTT - Clarity of contract renewal standards
2.72
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
women
white
white
white
 
NTT - Clarity of body of evidence for deciding contract renewal
2.85
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
women
white
white
white
+
NTT - Sense of contract renewal
3.38
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
full
 
 
 
white
 
NTT - Clarity of promotion process
3.00
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
women
white
asian
white
+
NTT - Clarity of promotion criteria
2.97
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
white
 
white
+
NTT - Clarity of promotion standards
2.75
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
white
 
white
+
NTT - Clarity of body of evidence for promotion decisions
2.92
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
assoc
women
white
 
white
+
NTT - Sense of promotion
3.08
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
white
 
white
+